Saturday, August 13, 2011

Federal Regulations Require

I had the most excellent day. Me and 6 friends went to John Pennekamp State Park in Key Largo and went on a 2 hour snorkeling tour. The weather was perfect during our water excursion and we enjoyed a fantastic voyage - despite the insane amount of jelly fish in the area. Before departure the two man crew of the vessel that would take us 5 miles out into the Atlantic Ocean gave a short orientation including the safety equipment on board. At one point I was interested to hear them say "Federal Regulations require a life vest for each person on board. You can be assured we have complied with that regulation". I didn't count them but clearly there were enough vests in the overhead compartment. Another Federal Regulation I learned is that there were two inflatable life boats on top of the vessel that could automatically float off the boat if it were to be submerged. The Captain joked that if we saw him get into that life boat - it might be a good idea to follow.

Thankfully we had a very nice and safe journey and didn't need the required safety equipment - although a sever storm did develop on our way home. I couldn't help but imagine that requiring those safety devices must have added to the overall cost of the voyage slightly cutting into the profits of the private company that runs these tours - yet they seem to be doing well. I was very grateful that those devices were there - after all, I'm a good swimmer and didn't even think that it might be a good idea to bring a life vest of my own on the tour. Plus the weather was nice - what could possibly go wrong? Thankfully Federal Regulators know that things do often go wrong. Thank you!

It should also be noted that our destination was known as Grecian Rocks - an amazing National Marine Sanctuary just off the Florida coast. Would it have been there in it's beautiful (almost) pristine condition if shipping vessels were allowed to traverse over this shallow water zone without regulation? Would it have survived without laws that keep people from dropping anchor on the fragile reef? Not likely.

I am very thankful that we have a Federal Government - paid by our tax dollars that not only protect these national treasures, but also keep us safe when visiting them. This is only one of many such Federal programs that will be in jeopardy if we allow the Tea Party mentality of "no government interference" into our society. The Federal Government does more than any of us realize to help us and protect us as a society. Certainly there are some programs that have run their course and may no longer be needed - and those programs should be cut. But we must use extreme caution on what programs are cut in the process. Our very lives are at stake.

Now, you may have noticed that I used the phrase "(almost) pristine" above. That part of this story is a little sad. I moved to Florida 20 years ago and visited the reef shortly after. It was simply AMAZING. But we were told that the reef was in danger and was dying at a rate of 10% per year. I thought that sounded extreme - but as it turns out it was true. The reef - while still beautiful, is nothing like it was then. The cause of the death of the reef is certainly debatable. However, I just wanted to point out that scientists who were observing the situation accurately predicted it's decline. It's very important to listen to environmental scientists and work to protect not only fragile national sanctuaries - but our own fragile environment as well. This is the function of another extremely important Federal program called the Environmental Protection Agency. It is a program the Tea Party is dead set on destroying. Please don't let them.


12 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'll never forget the former Cop that taught my Sociology class in college, who said this: "Everything that the ACLU stands for, I'm against."

The class reacted loudly. Can you imagine? I would guess he's a teabagger now.
Lisa

Andre said...

Hmm, let's see...a former First Responder, currently a working Academic, against a class full of young "heads full of mush" students.

If I had never even heard of the ACLU before, but based solely on the relative real-life experience and level of educational attainment of these two parties, whose judgement would I probably give the most weight to?


"I would guess he's a teabagger now."

No, it sounds like he was a "tea-bagger" then.

Andre said...

I'm pretty sure it's not laws and regulations protecting fragile reefs, or mandating life jackets on charter boats, that drive Americans crazy.

It's the totally insane stuff like this:

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0401-0450/sb_432_bill_20110216_introduced.html

Scroll down to Section 1, (1).

This is not a joke.

This is an actual bill being considered by my State legislature.
(It is estimated that this little piece of lunacy alone would add an estimated $15 to $30 million dollars in costs to an already hurting California hotel industry).

BTW: California's Budget Deficit this year is around 26 Billion dollars.

denbec said...

Bad mood Andre? Did you wake up with your sheets in a bunch? LOL My question is why do these politicians keep grouping stupid stuff with good stuff?! Section 2 of this makes good sense for the health of the hotel workers. This is a very minor example of ridiculous earmarks and pork barrel politics that happens on both sides. I wrote about it briefly in 2005.

http://denbec.blogspot.com/2005/12/ill-have-2-eggs-over-easy-with-ham-and.html

This type of thing IS THE MAIN REASON we find ourselves over spending in government.

Andre said...

"...the Environmental Protection Agency. It is a program the Tea Party is dead set on destroying."

But that's nowhere near the same thing as saying that there should be NO environmental regulations at all, and I think you would be hard pressed to find any American, Tea Partier or otherwise, who would hold such a position. It just means that any needed (legitimate) regulating and oversight should devolve to the State level where possible, and what needs to be done on the Federal level could just as effectively (probably even more effectively!) be handled out of a few corner offices in the Interior Department.

The EPA is a huge, over-bloated, expensive, bureaucracy; it should be eliminated. By your own reef example, they do not even protect the environment very well. As with most other huge Government agencies and Departments, what they do best, and what in reality is their true mission and reason for being, is to continue to expand and grow and continue to waste billions and billions of taxpayer dollars:

"...the Energy Department was created in 1977 when the U.S. imported 35 percent of its oil. The department’s purpose was to make the U.S. energy-independent. Since its creation, the department has spent hundreds of billions of dollars and has 109,000 employees and contractors. We now import 65 percent of our oil and no new nuclear power plants have been built in over 30 years.

The Department of Education was created in 1980 for the purpose of improving U.S. education. Since then, overall per pupil K-12 spending has increased (in constant dollars) from approximately $6,000 per year to $12,500 per year. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent by the department since 1980, yet scores for 17-year-olds on the National Assessment of Educational Progress — often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card” — have remained unchanged."

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/274738/todays-questions-president-peter-kirsanow

denbec said...

I couldn't disagree more with your EPA comments. The EPA should be a WORLD WIDE effort - after all we are all sharing this one world.

I won't argue that some federal programs are somewhat ineffective or broken. The solution is not to eliminate them - but find out why they are not working and fix them. That's what reasonable rational thinkers would do.

Anonymous said...

I don't want to live in a country that doesn't have a government entity like the EPA. Can you imagine if the water delivered to your house was polluted? Or if there were flammable gases included in that water? Fracking anyone? How about if the gas delivered to your home wasn't metered and controlled and when you turned on your clothes dryer and your house blew up!? I don't want to live in that country. Utilities provided by the government for the common good is a GOOD THING and it was created to protect the citizens for their safety and to keep the costs to a minimum.

BTW, a quick google search provided me with the date of 1867 as the creation date of the US Department of Education. The Department of Education Organization Act was created by the Department of Education (Public Law 96-88) and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979. It divided the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare into the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services. The Department of Education is administered by the United States Secretary of Education. So you got your dates totally wrong Andre. I don't understand this 'THE GOV'T IS BAD" thing that the conservatives shout out.

Oh wait, I remember that quote that made its way around the country. "The government is the problem." Yeah, that one.

Totally messed up the masses because up until then, we could work together for the common good. I'm not saying they were good at it, but compromise wasn't a dirty word then. But that was probably before your time Andre, so maybe difficult to relate to.

And that will have to do for the day. Good Evening!
Lisa

Andre said...

Lisa, do you seriously believe that if the EPA were to somehow just disappear overnight, that your local town or city water district would just throw their hands up in the air and say "Aw screw it, let's just start pumping untreated swamp water into people's homes."?

Local municipalities have been providing clean, safe drinking water to their citizens for generations; long before the EPA ever existed, and if the EPA were to cease to exist, that supply of clean, safe drinking water would continue to flow uninterrupted.

Andre said...

"I don't understand this 'THE GOV'T IS BAD" thing that the conservatives shout out. "

If you truly want to begin to understand,here is one place you might begin:

http://www.amazon.com/Road-Serfdom-F-Hayek/dp/B001HWT06U/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1313554304&sr=8-2

or here:

http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Freedom-Anniversary-Milton-Friedman/dp/0226264211/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1313554304&sr=8-5

or here:

http://www.amazon.com/Conflict-Visions-Ideological-Political-Struggles/dp/0465002056/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1313556397&sr=1-6

denbec said...

Andre - this is where you and your Tea Party friends really show your ignorance if you actually believe that corporations operate in the best interest of the people. In fact they only operate in the interest of profit and will do whatever is needed to increase those profits including bypassing safety or quality. We wouldn't need all these regulations if corporations did the right thing - but they don't and they won't without government oversight. That is the plain and simple truth.

Anonymous said...

Federal or State regulations can prevent illness, accidents and death. Just ask the 45 people that were in the range of that Stage Roof that collapsed in Indy last Saturday. Surely, you saw that footage. Apparently, inspections weren't performed, nor were they required by law. At least, not for the temporary stage even though the carnival rides were inspected. I say, let the lawsuits begin and I'm not a lawyer lover at all. I believe one should be protected by incompetence or sabotage.

My point is not that an inspection would have prevented the accident, but when innocent lives are lost or damaged for the rest of their lives, maybe Gov't regulations aren't so bad eh? I'm all for that expansion of government. All for it.

And another thing, I really believe that our food supply is being polluted more than what makes the news. I've had food poisoning more than once since moving to Indy and it was from restaurants. I didn't report it but I probably should have. Next time, I will.

Lisa

P.S. Have a nice weekend. Beach, here I come.

Andre said...

"Gov't regulations aren't so bad eh? I'm all for that expansion of government. All for it."

Here you go, Lisa, this will make your weekend. Enjoy:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/274923/regulatory-hiring-bloom-veronique-de-rugy

You could maybe have the chart in the article linked to above printed onto a t-shirt, then you could really be a cheerleader for Big Government! (I probably shouldn't give you any ideas).